Variations in patterns of prescribing durvalumab in stage III lung cancer: a survey of Australian Medical Oncologists.

BACKGROUND: Local Australian guidelines for the optimal management of stage III unresectable NSCLC are lacking. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines recommend consolidation durvalumab for all patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC irrespective of their PD-L1 expression or driver mutation status. The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) differs, with consolidation durvalumab only recommended in those patients whose tumours express PD-L1. METHODS: Due to differing global guidelines we conducted an Australia and New Zealand wide survey of medical oncologists specialising in thoracic cancer to determine the variations in patterns of prescribing durvalumab in stage III unresectable NSCLC. This survey was done electronically and sponsored by the Thoracic Oncology Group of Australia (TOGA). RESULTS: Thirty-two medical oncologists completed the survey. In patients with EGFR¬-mutated stage III unresectable NSCLC, 6% of respondents stated that they prescribed durvalumab for all patients, whilst an additional 6% strongly recommended treatment. Fourty-four percent suggested little benefit of consolidation durvalumab in this cohort, with an additional 19% advocating for observation only. In patients with PD-L1 negative (0%) stage III unresectable NSCLC, 13% of respondents prescribed durvalumab for all patients, whilst an additional 56% strongly recommended treatment. Interestingly, 18%, 10% and 10% of prescribers discussed self-funded oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in patients with EGFR, ALK or ROS-1 mutated NSCLC respectively as a substitute for consolidation durvalumab. CONCLUSION: Overall, the clinical practice of Australian and New Zealand Medical Oncologists is variable, but remains consistent with either the ASCO or ESMO guidelines. Local practice guidelines are required to ensure consistency in prescribing patterns across Australia, as well as providing evidence for self-funded treatments outside standard of care.

Comparison of capecitabine concentrations determined by microsampling versus plasma concentrations for therapeutic drug monitoring: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic drug monitoring allows personalized dosing of chemotherapy, but is not well established for capecitabine. The aim of this study was to compare the concentrations of capecitabine and its metabolites obtained simultaneously by microsampling with plasma sampling and their acceptability to patients. METHODS: Adults taking capecitabine for cancer had paired (duplicate) microsampling at steady state (hour 2 post dose) using Mitra® devices and venous blood samples for analysis. Capecitabine and metabolites were measured using a validated mass spectrometry assay. Correlation between the sampling methods was determined. Patients' preferences were elicited using a Likert numeric rating scale and pain by a Visual Analog Scale (range, 0-10). KEY FINDINGS: Capecitabine concentrations from 10 patients (60 paired samples) by microsampling and plasma sampling were highly correlated (Pearson correlation: 0.97, Coefficients of determination: 0.94, P < 0.0001). Capecitabine concentrations in capillary sampling were consistently lower than the paired plasma concentration (median capecitabine capillary/plasma concentration ratio = 2851/3846 µg/l 75%). The agreement between sampling matrices showed a 28% bias (95% Cl, 4.02-52.00). Participant ratings showed microsampling was the preferred method by all 10 patients. Most participants reported no pain with microsampling (median 0, range 0-1). CONCLUSION: Capecitabine concentration measured by microsampling and plasma sampling were highly correlated, but consistently lower in microsampling. Microsampling was the preferred method with minimal pain.

Influence of age on pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites in older adults with cancer: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine is an oral chemotherapy prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with unpredictable toxicity, especially in older adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of capecitabine and its metabolites in younger adults (< 70 years) and older adults (≥ 70 years) receiving capecitabine for solid cancer. METHODS: Eligible participants receiving capecitabine had 2 venous samples collected on day 14 of cycle 1 and cycle 2 of their treatment. Capecitabine and metabolite concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. A Bayesian estimation approach was used to generate individual estimates of PK parameters for 5-FU. A linear mixed-effect analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to compare dose-normalised log-transformed PK parameters between age groups. Correlations were determined by linear regression and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the total 26 participants, 58% were male with a median age of 67 years (range, 37-85) with 54% aged < 70 years and 46% aged ≥ 70 years. Participants aged ≥ 70 years, compared to those aged < 70 years, had a greater 5-FU exposure based on area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 17% (90% CI 103-134%; 0.893 vs. 0.762 mg h/L) and 14% increase in maximal concentration, Cmax (90% CI 82.1-159%; 0.343 vs. 0.300 mg/L). The 5-FU Cmax was positively associated with time up and go (TUG) (Pearson's correlation 0.77, p = 0.01), but not other geriatric assessment domains or severe toxicity. CONCLUSION: 5-FU exposure was significantly increased in older adults compared to younger adults receiving equivalent doses of capecitabine, and is a possible cause for increased toxicity in older adults.

Dried Blood Spot Sampling in the Monitoring of Anticancer Therapy for Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a convenient alternative to whole-blood sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies that have examined and used DBS sampling for the TDM of chemotherapy and targeted therapy agents for the treatment of patients with solid cancers. METHODS: Using the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search of EMBASE and PUBMED was performed to identify eligible clinical studies that used DBS sampling to monitor chemotherapy or targeted therapy for the treatment of solid cancers. RESULTS: Of the 23 eligible studies, 3 measured concordance between drug concentrations determined by DBS and whole-blood, 7 developed analytical methods of DBS, and 13 performed both. DBS was employed for the TDM of everolimus (3 studies), vemurafenib (2 studies), pazopanib (2 studies), abiraterone (2 studies), mitotane, imatinib, adavosertib, capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, etoposide, irinotecan, docetaxel, gefitinib, palbociclib/ribociclib, and paclitaxel (one study each). The studies included a median of 14 participants (range: 6-34), with 10-50 µL of blood dispensed on DBS cards (20) and Mitra devices (3). Seventeen of the 20 studies that used DBS found no significant impact of the hematocrit on the accuracy and precision of the developed method in the normal hematocrit ranges (eg, 29.0%-59.0%). DBS and plasma or venous concentrations were highly correlated (correlation coefficient, 0.872-0.999) for all drugs, except mitotane, which did not meet a predefined level of significance (r > 0.872; correlation coefficient, r = 0.87, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: DBS provides an alternative sampling strategy for the TDM of many anticancer drugs. Further research is required to establish a standardized approach for sampling and processing DBS samples to allow future implementation.

Prevalence and severity of scanxiety in people with advanced cancers: a multicentre survey.

PURPOSE: Scan-associated anxiety ('scanxiety') is a problem for people with advanced cancer. We aimed to determine the prevalence, severity and associations of scanxiety in this population. METHODS: People with advanced cancer and a computed tomography scan within the last 4 months completed a multicentre survey including self-rated presence (yes/no) and severity (distress thermometer, 0-10) of scanxiety, state anxiety (STAI-6), clinical anxiety and depression (HADS), and fear of progression (FOP-Q-SF). Associations with scanxiety were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 222 participants: mean age 64 years (range 26 to 91), female (61%), most common cancer types (breast 37%, lung 19%, colorectal 16%) and > 1 year since cancer diagnosis (82%). Sixty-two percent had a scan within the last month, and 70% reported waiting > 2 days for the result. Over half (55%) of participants experienced scanxiety. On multivariable analysis, scanxiety was more prevalent in participants who were younger (mean age 62 years with v 66 years without scanxiety, p = 0.02) and more remote (v major city, OR 2.6, p = 0.04). Among participants with scanxiety, the mean severity score was 6 (range 1-10) with peak severity occurring when waiting for scan results. On multivariable analysis, scanxiety was 1.2 points higher in participants who had been diagnosed within the past year (v > 1 year, p = 0.04) and was higher in participants who had higher STAI-6 scores (ß = 0.06, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Scanxiety is common and can be severe. Strategies to reduce scanxiety are needed.

Measurement of 5- fluorouracil, capecitabine and its metabolite concentrations in blood using volumetric absorptive microsampling technology and LC-MS/MS.

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its oral formulation, capecitabine, are widely used in treating a range of malignancies, either alone or in combination with other antineoplastic drugs. Body surface area-based dosing is used for these agents, despite this approach leading to substantial variability in drug exposure and often resulting in either toxicity or treatment failure. Tailoring therapeutic regimens for individual patients using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been shown to significantly reduce toxicity and improve cancer outcomes. However, for optimum TDM, sample timing is crucial, along with the need for a venepuncture blood sample to obtain the plasma currently used for 5-FU measurement. In addition to complex blood sample handling requirements, large sample volume and frequent sampling required for pharmacokinetic analysis is another barrier to successfully implementing TDM in a healthcare setting. Microsampling is an alternative collection method to venepuncture, which, combined with the now readily available liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) technology, overcomes the plasma-associated issues. It also has the significant advantage of enabling at home and remote sampling, thus facilitating 5-FU TDM in clinical practice. A LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous measurement of capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine and 5-FU using Mitra® microsampling devices for sample collection was developed. A Shimadzu 8060 LC-MS/MS equipped with electrospray ionisation source interface, operated in positive and negative ion modes, with reversed-phase chromatographic separation was employed for sample analysis. Samples were extracted from Mitra® devices using acetonitrile containing stable isotope-labelled internal standards, sonicated, evaporated under vacuum and resuspended in 0.1 % formic acid before injection into the LC-MS/MS. Chromatographic separation was on a Luna Omega Polar C18 (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.6 µm) column with gradient elution of 0.1 % formic acid in water and acetonitrile. Total run time was 5 min, with the injection volume of 1 µL. The intra and inter-day imprecision ranged from 3.0 to 8.1 and 6.3-13.3 % respectively. Accuracy ranged from 95 -114 % for all analytes. Lower limit of quantification with imprecision of < 19 % and accuracy between 89 and 114 % was 0.05 mg/L for 5-FU and 10 µg/L for other analytes. Assays were linear from 0.05 to 50 mg/L for 5-FU and 10-10,000 µg/L for all other analytes. Analytes were stable on Mitra® devices for up to 9 months at room temperature, 2 years at -30 ℃ and 3 days at 50 ℃. The method was successfully applied for the analysis of samples from patients undergoing cancer treatment with 5-FU and capecitabine. Microsampling using volumetric absorptive microsampling proved to be as reliable as conventional blood collection for 5-FU and capecitabine. This sampling technique may lead to less invasive and better-timed sample collection for TDM, supporting dose optimization strategy.

Utilisation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and 5-Year Survival Analysis of Prospectively Recorded Cohort Data for Older Adults Versus Younger Adults with Resected Primary Colon Cancer.

PURPOSE: Colon cancer is predominantly a disease of older adults. Studies determining the influence of age on outcomes of colon cancer have conflicting results. We aim to determine the long-term outcomes and utilisation of adjuvant chemotherapy of older adults compared with younger adults who had had a resection of a primary colon cancer. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had resection of a primary colon cancer between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 were identified from a prospective database and stratified into three age groups: ≤ 69 years, 70 to 79 years, and ≥ 80 years. Age-related differences in patients, cancer, and treatment characteristics were determined by chi-square tests. Five-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier method and by multivariable Cox regression analysis to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Of 1135 included patients, 469 (41%) patients were aged ≤ 69 years, 382 (34%) were 70-79 years, and 284 (25%) were ≥ 80 years. Increasing age group predicted more comorbidity (p < 0.001), cardiac comorbidity (p < 0.001), right-sided cancers (p < 0.001), and less adjuvant chemotherapy (stage III only; p < 0.001). Increasing age group was associated with worse overall survival by stage (p < 0.001) but not cancer-specific survival by stage (p = 0.83). Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer independently predicted improved overall survival (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with younger adults, older adults with colon cancer had worse survival outcomes and received less adjuvant chemotherapy.

Pharmacokinetics of Anticancer Drugs Used in Treatment of Older Adults With Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Older adults with cancer experience more toxicity from anticancer therapy, possibly because of age-related changes in the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of anticancer drugs. We aimed to evaluate studies investigating the effect of aging on the PK of anticancer therapies used in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A systematic literature search of EMBASE and PubMed was performed to find eligible studies that assessed the effect of age on the PK of anticancer therapies used in the treatment of CRC. RESULTS: The 21 eligible studies included 17 prospective studies and 4 pooled analyses of prospective studies. Of these, PK of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was determined in 7 studies, oxaliplatin in 2 studies, capecitabine in 3 studies, irinotecan in 4 studies, bevacizumab in 1 study, cetuximab in 3 studies, and panitumumab in 1 study. Studies included a median of 44 patients and had varying definitions for older adults: 65 years or older (3 studies), older than 70 years (3 studies), or older than 75 years (1 study). Increasing age significantly affected the PK parameters of irinotecan with a 7%-8% reduction in CL (P < 0.001) for every 10 years in patients older than 60 years and an increase in area under the curve (r = 0.44, P = 0.007) and Cmax (r = 0.42, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Older age mainly influences PK of irinotecan and, to some extent, that of capecitabine, 5-FU, and panitumumab, but there is limited evidence for age-related changes in PK of other anticancer therapies used in the management of older adults with CRC. Factors other than PK may be responsible for the greater toxicity of these agents experienced by older adults.

Insomnia in Cancer--Associations and Implications.

BACKGROUND: Insomnia is a common condition in cancer patients. In spite of the high prevalence its associations have not been well studied. Existing data suggests that insomnia is related to depression and pain. However, the impact of ongoing chemotherapy on sleep is not investigated. AIM: To study the relationship between insomnia and chemotherapy after analysing confounding variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who visited New England Oncology Clinic in Tamworth were recruited. Insomnia was assessed with the Bergen insomnia scale. The Montgomery Asberg Depression rating scale was used to measure depression. Pain was assessed with the Brief Pain inventory. Chronic medical conditions, type of cancer, side effects to chemotherapy, role of steroids and other drugs were studied as confounders. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients participated in the study. Age ranged from 33 to 83 years (mean: 63.6, SD=10.97). There were 29 men and 27 women. 42 patients received at least one form of chemotherapy and 15 were receiving radiotherapy at the time of assessment. Mean insomnia score was significantly higher in those receiving chemotherapy than in those without chemotherapy (8.92 vs 17.2, two tailed p=0.005, 95% CI=2.63-13.71). There was no significant variation in insomnia scores in terms of chronic medical condition, type of cancer, psychiatric history, use of steroids or adverse effects of chemotherapy. However, total insomnia score was correlated with depression rating score (Pearson correlation, r=0.39, p=0.003) and magnitude of pain (r=0.37, p=0.006). On regression analysis only pain was found to be predictive of insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: Insomnia in patients with cancer is found to be associated with concurrent chemotherapy and correlated with degree of depression and pain. Identifying factors related to insomnia in cancer population has implications in its management and patient education.

Trastuzumab Exposure in Early Pregnancy for a Young Lady With Locally Invasive Breast Cancer.

Due to the lack of literature on the effects of trastuzumab in pregnancy, an interest has been taken in a patient that incidentally became pregnant while on adjuvant treatment in the first trimester following diagnosis of locally advanced breast cancer.

Unmet Supportive Cancer Care Needs: An Exploratory Quantitative Study in Rural Australia.

BACKGROUND: There is a discernible, often ignored under-evaluated care-management gap in supportive cancer care, where the estimated clinical outcome is seldom translated into patient-centered benefit. METHODS: The present research is an exploratory cross-sectional quantitative questionnaire survey study done in rural regions of Australia with the sole purpose of evaluating the care-management gap in terms of the unmet supportive needs of advanced cancer patients to provide baseline data for planning, drafting and implementing innovative and effective supportive care services that will address the specific priorities and unmet needs identified in this vulnerable population in the remote and rural regions. RESULTS: The questionnaire (NA-ACP) was comprised of 132 questions covering seven domains of supportive care. Three centers in rural regions of Australia were selected for the study. While center 1 had medical and surgical specialties, centers 2 and 3 were outreach oncology clinics with nurse-led chemotherapy units. A total sample of 75 patients getting continuous treatment procedures at these three oncology units was given the NA-ACP questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The data from this study can be used to improve and inform care for this population by identifying specific unmet supportive needs.